Hidden Cameras, Surveillance Systems Wholesale
Opportunity to Sell Hidden Cameras, Surveillance Systems

Hidden Cameras in the Workplace OK

November 18th, 2011

There are many business owners who feel the need for hidden cameras in the work place to help deter employee theft, false accusations of sexual harassment, wasted time, etc.  However, they have concerns about the legality and ethics of placing hidden cameras in the workplace.    A recent California Supreme Court decision should help alleviate some of that concern.  This siding, in the ultra-liberal state of California, for the employer over the employees bringing the suit is very encouraging for all business owners.

The California Supreme Court held held that employees have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the workplace, but that right has limits. And it doesn’t prevent employers from conducting some hidden surveillance in an employee’s office for “legitimate business concerns.”

“An employer may have sound reasons for monitoring the workplace,” Justice Marvin Baxter wrote for a unanimous court, “and an intrusion upon the employee’s reasonable privacy expectations may not be egregious or actionable under the particular circumstances.”

This ruling came about in October 2002 when office manager Abigail Hernandez and administrative assistant Maria Lopez discovered hidden video equipment in the office they shared at Pasadena’s Hillsides Children’s Center, a facility that houses abused children. Executive Director John Hitchcock had installed the equipment in an unsuccessful attempt to catch someone who had been viewing pornography on Lopez’s computer in the wee hours of the morning.

Hitchcock was particularly concerned because many of the 66 boys and girls at the center had been the victims of emotional, physical and sexual abuse. No one was ever apprehended.

Neither Hernandez nor Lopez were suspects, and the camera — activated only after work hours — never recorded them. Nonetheless, they were distraught upon discovering the camera and sued for invasion of privacy.

Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge C. Edward Simpson granted summary judgment to the center. But Los Angeles’ 2nd District Court of Appeal reversed in 2006, holding that the mere placement of the surveillance equipment in the women’s office without their knowledge invaded their privacy.

On Monday, the Supreme Court justices split the difference, saying that while they could understand the two women’s “dismay,” the placement of the hidden camera wasn’t egregious, and the employer had a valid reason for doing what he did.

This court decision has given employers the right to use surveillance systems and hidden cameras for legitimate business concerns.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • Pownce
  • MySpace

Filed under: Hidden Cameras,Surveillance Systems | Tags: , ,
November 18th, 2011 07:49:31
16 comments

Businesses ought to be able to monitor what goes on in the workplace without fear of invading anyone’s privacy. It’s the business owners call just as an employee has the same option for their own home.


Hidden Cameras
August 17, 2009

I would have to agree that in light of all the activities that occur in businesses, whether it be false accusations or real life occurrences, a remedy is needed that will grant businesses the ability to monitor the actions of employees while they conduct business.

Activities that occur after business hours are even less controllable by the business owner, but who might still be held liable for illegal or illegitimate activities that could occur without his or her knowledge.
Sadly, we live in a more and more litigious world and it is in the best interests of the business owner to keep an eye, albeit hidden, on what goes on when he or she is not around. I would consider this a good judgement on behalf of the business community in California and would hope that other state’s courts view it similarly.


Hidden Camera Rental
March 12, 2010

They could save some money and rent a hidden camera. use it and give it back.

[...] claims and other things detrimental to their business, many business owners are installing hidden cameras in the workplace.  They have the right to defend their businesses with these surveillance, and sometimes, covert [...]

[...] usage of hidden cameras in the workplace has been a cause of talk and dispute. A number of state statutes and data protection laws which [...]

[...] utilization of hidden cameras in the workplace has been a cause of discussion and debate. Certain state statutes and data protection laws which [...]

[...] usage of hidden cameras in the workplace has been a cause of discussion and debate. A number of state statutes and data protection laws that [...]

[...] usage of hidden cameras in the workplace has been a point of argument and dispute. Certain state statutes and data protection laws which [...]

[...] usage of hidden cameras in the workplace has been a cause of discussion and dispute. A number of state statutes and data protection laws [...]

[...] use of hidden cameras in the workplace has been a point of discussion and debate. Certain state statutes and data protection laws that [...]

[...] utilization of hidden cameras in the workplace has been a source of discussion and dispute. A number of state statutes and data protection laws [...]

[...] use of hidden cameras in the workplace has been a source of dialogue and dispute. A number of state statutes and data protection laws that [...]

[...] utilization of hidden cameras in the workplace has been a cause of talk and debate. Certain state statutes and data protection laws that touch on [...]

[...] usage of hidden cameras in the workplace has been a source of discussion and debate. A number of state statutes and data protection laws [...]

[...] utilization of hidden cameras in the workplace has been a point of talk and debate. Certain state statutes and data protection laws that touch on [...]


CCTV Cameras
January 5, 2012

I don’t see how it can be an invasion of privacy if the camera was never switched on whilst they were at work. It sounds as if Hitchcock had a legitimate concern and was doing his best to safeguard the vulnerable children in his care.

Leave a Reply




Security Code: